Our recent study of Sharps injury (SI) incidence in USA shows there has been little reduction in overall SI incidence in last 10 years. This is puzzling as, under OSHA law, every hospital must use safety engineered devices (SED) wherever commercially available and clinically feasible, review their Exposure Control Plan and new technology annually, and maintain a log of all SI. We also know that every hospital is conscious of their SI incidence and is striving to reduce it. So why hasn’t the national incidence decreased?
In a recent publication to investigate one possible reason for the above, I audited a sample of 18 sharps containers from 5 Florida healthcare facilities. The results were disturbing – over half of the sharps were NOT SED, and of the SED, 22% were NOT activated. It is only a sampling of one region in one state but my experience tells me these results may reflect a national phenomenon.
These results indicate that:
- less SED are being used than thought (do staff have non-official access to non-SED?), and
- more SED are non-activated than thought (do staff not see need to always activate?).
Non-use and non-activation of SED may be one explanation for the lack of falling SI incidence in USA.
Are you a healthcare professional?
- If so, how do we correct this?
- Under what circumstances do you see HCP:
- not using SED?
- not activating SED?
I’d like to hear your feedback and opinions…
This is my first blog so please forgive any ineptness – I felt I should quickly get the word out to as many as I could. My recent national survey with my colleague Linda Good estimated that 322,000 US healthcare personnel (HCP) sustain sharps Injuries (SI) each year – but that disturbing news is compounded by the fact that our results show there has been no significant decrease in this figure since 2001. And this is in a developed country that has enacted sharps injury specific laws (NSPA 2001) – think of the plight of HCP in developing countries with scarce resources for safety devices.
Sharps injuries (penetrating injuries of the skin by a cutting/pointy item) among HCP can transmit over 60 different diseases (AJIC 2006) the three most published being HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C. With Hepatitis B, the risk of getting disease from a positive patient is a worrying 1 in 30. This worrying is an important but often neglected facet. HCP often have to wait months for confirmation of “All clear” and have to modify their sexual and maternal practices while waiting, and this takes a huge emotional toll on injured HCP. I know of 4 marriages that have broken under this stress.
Along with many colleagues I am striving to bring this situation to the notice of politicians, healthcare administrators and managers, and the public. We need put zero back on the radar. We need find a new vigor to protect these workers – it may be more intense, repetitive, competency-based education, HCP ownership of their safety, or technology less dependent on human behavior, but a change must occur.